Use case · Vulnerability prioritization
Prioritize vulnerability work with evidence beyond a severity score
A package match and CVSS score are useful starting points, but they do not describe the deployed environment. Artemes AI is built to place observed runtime and configuration evidence, sourced exploit intelligence, asset context, and missing information beside the finding before a team decides what to fix first.
Distinguish technical severity from operational priority
Keep CISA KEV and FIRST EPSS facts tied to sourced reference data
Show the evidence gaps that still require practitioner verification
Triage
Turn a scanner candidate into a reviewable decision
The workflow adds only the context supported by current telemetry and reference data.
Confirm the affected condition
Use installed software, runtime state, listeners, configuration, and asset identity where those observations are available.
Add exploit context
Attach reviewed software-to-CVE matches, CISA KEV status, and FIRST EPSS data without asking the model to invent reference facts.
Record what is unknown
Preserve missing exposure, control, ownership, or business context and identify the next verification step.
Decision support
Give analysts and system owners the same rationale
A useful priority explains why work moved up, moved down, or stayed pending.
Priority reasons
Keep the facts that increase concern beside the finding, including sourced exploitation signals and observed system state.
Priority reducers
Record available control or deployment evidence that may reduce urgency without claiming the vulnerability is harmless.
Recommended next step
Give the owner a verification or remediation action grounded in the evidence retained with the record.
Good fit
Use this workflow where context can change the queue
The use case is strongest when teams already have findings but lack a consistent way to explain remediation order.
Backlog review
Revisit large finding queues with current endpoint, exploitability, ownership, and lifecycle context.
Known-exploited review
Identify records with sourced KEV data and inspect the local evidence needed for an environment-specific decision.
Remediation handoff
Carry the affected scope, rationale, owner, due date, and recommended next step into an accountable workflow.
Test the workflow on a representative backlog
Request early access to choose a bounded asset set and define the evidence required for a useful prioritization review.
Request Early Access